Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Jefferson v. Williams
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Orlando Jefferson
Defendant:
Warden Doug Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Wheeler Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Orlando Jefferson
Defendant:
Wheeler Correctional Facility, The State of Georgia and Warden Doug Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Williams
as 3:2023cv00077
Petitioner:
Orlando Jefferson
Respondent:
Warden Doug Williams
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jefferson v. Williams
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Orlando Jefferson
Defendant:
Warden Doug Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Williams
as 1:2023cv04272
Plaintiff:
Orlando Jefferson
Defendant:
Doug Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Wheeler Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2023cv04130
Plaintiff:
Orlando Jefferson
Defendant:
Wheeler Correctional Facility, The State of Georgia and Doug Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Williams
as 1:2023cv03938
Plaintiff:
Orlando Jefferson
Defendant:
Doug Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Williams
as 1:2023cv02260
Petitioner:
Mr. Demetrius Mosley
Respondent:
Mr. Doug Williams, Judge Craig L. Schwall, T. Coun. Tawanna L. Payton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jefferson v. Williams
as 1:2023cv01267
Petitioner:
Orlando Jefferson
Respondent:
Doug Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santais v. Ward
as 1:2021cv04919
Petitioner:
Yves Santais
Respondent:
Doug William and Timothy Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
