Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Hills v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Sheriff John Myers, Lt. Susan Taylor and Sgt. Dana Mobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Whiteville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Douglas
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility, Chance Leeds and Latoya Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Datrin Travis
Defendant:
Sarah-Ann Williams, Chief T. Conrad, A. Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Mathis
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland and Maury County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01163
Petitioner:
Chavis Douglas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Douglas v. Bolar
as 1:2023cv01110
Petitioner:
Tony Douglas
Respondent:
J. Bolar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Douglas v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01106
Petitioner:
Dontoreus Douglas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Douglas v. USA
as 3:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Jorge Luis Douglas, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
