Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Downs v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00085
Petitioner:
Erik Downs
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Downs v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Erik Downs
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
People's United Equipment Finance Corp. v. Down to Earth Golf Course Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
People's United Equipment Finance Corp.
Defendant:
Down to Earth Golf Course Construction, Inc. and David Griffin
Counter_claimant:
David Griffin and Down to Earth Golf Course Construction, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
People's United Equipment Finance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zorn v. The State of Vermont et al
as 1:2011cv00221
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Zorn
Defendant:
The State of Vermont, The United States of America, Vermont State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Hanover Insurance Company et al
as 1:2010mc00046
Plaintiff:
H. Richard Austin
Defendant:
Hanover Insurance Company, Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company and Downs, Rachlin & Martin
Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC v. Cowder
as 2:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC
Defendant:
Gulnaz Cowder
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC v. Cowder
as 1:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC, Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC and Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC
Defendant:
Gulnaz Cowder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Voitle et al v. Rogers et al
as 1:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
Robin Voitle, Robin Voitle, Robert Voitle and others
Defendant:
Wally Rogers, Paul Simmons, Irasburg School District and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
