Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. FERC
as 23-1302
Petitioner:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
ASIAMAH v. LIFE STORAGE
as 1:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
DUKE ASIAMAH
Defendant:
LIFE STORAGE (EXTRA SPACE STORAGE) and LIFE STORAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BURRESS-EL v. DUKE ENERGY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02967
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN BURRESS-EL
Defendant:
ROCCO O. D'ASENZO, BOB MCMAHON, LARISA M. VAYSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
AINSWORTH et al v. ISLAMIC REPBULIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv02424
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY A AINSWORTH, JODI CATHLEEN NAKATA, JILL MARIE HIGGINS and others
Not Classified By Court:
CLYDE WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPBULIC OF IRAN, THE IRANIAN MINISTRY, ISLAMIC REPBULIC OF IRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
USA v. Darin Moore, Jr.
as 23-3072
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Darin C. Moore, Jr., also known as Darin Carlyle Moore, Jr., also known as Duke
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. FERC
as 23-1114
Petitioner:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
MISO Transmission Owners, et al v. FERC
as 23-1033
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, Ameren Services Company, as agent for Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company, d/b/a Ameren Illinois and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC v. FCC, et al
as 23-1010
Petitioner:
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC, d/b/a AT&T North Carolina, d/b/a AT&T South Carolina
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. FERC
as 22-1327
Petitioner:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
