Cases 1 - 10 of 83
WOODARD v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
STEVE LAVON J WOODARD, SR
Defendant:
SMITH, GRIFFIN, BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. BARTON et al
as 5:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
MARY BARTON, JAMES SKIPPER, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duke v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Wayne Duke
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dukes v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2021cv82156
Plaintiff:
Jaycobby R. Dukes
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dukes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2021cv00128
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
JOSHUA LEE DUKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kaufman v. Self et al
as 5:2020cv00508
Defendant:
Capt. FNU Bowen, J Wildy, Marion County Sheriffs Office and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jay Kaufman, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEPRIEST v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00017
Plaintiff:
JON DUKE DEPRIEST
Defendant:
CENTURION LLC, CORIZON LLC, JULIE L JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv01438
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Thomas Gerald Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pace v. Lawerance et al
as 1:2019cv22928
Defendant:
E. Cobarco, B. Martin, Omar Kaersenthout and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Pace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
