Cases 1 - 10 of 353
Jordan v. MacLaren
as 5:2021cv11680
Petitioner:
Joei Alexander Jordan
Defendant:
Warden Duncan MacLaren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Darius Theriot v. Duncan MacLaren, et al
as 21-2596
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DOCTOR, DUNCAN MACLAREN, Former Warden, UNKNOWN CAPTAIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RUSSELL DEFREITAS, Registered Nurse, DALE BEAULIEU, Sergeant, MIKE LAWSON, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIUS THERIOT
Sean Rogers v. Duncan MacLaren, et al
as 20-1720
Defendant / Appellee:
HEARING INVESTIGATOR VANSLOTEN, Kinross Correctional Facility, DUNCAN MACLAREN, Warden Kinross Correctional Facility, D. MASTEW, Deputy Warden/Administrative Assistant Kinross Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN ADAM ROGERS
Stanley Parker v. Colleen Myotte, et al
as 20-1144
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID MASTAW, Administrative Assistant to the Warden, KIRK MAHER, Mail Room Sorting Location, RICHARD RUSSELL, MDOC Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY PARKER
Ronald Davis v. MDOC, et al
as 19-2264
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD LAMONT DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS MORTENSEN, DUNCAN MACLAREN and DONALD MANSFIELD
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Scott Sedore v. Duncan MacLaren
as 19-2184
Defendant / Appellee:
DUNCAN MACLAREN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT SEDORE
Alger v. MacLaren et al
as 2:2019cv12889
Defendant:
Randall Haas, Vansloten, Duncan MacLaren and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. Alger, Sr.
Carl Morris v. Jack Kowalski
as 19-2132
Respondent / Appellee:
DUNCAN MACLAREN and JACK KOWALSKI
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARL MORRIS
Kenneth Colvin, Jr. v. Duncan MacLaren, et al
as 19-1825
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DUNCAN MACLAREN, LIEUTENANT ALEX VERT, DEPUTY WARDEN JERRY HARWOOD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH COLVIN, JR.
Freddy Hardrick v. Duncan MacLaren, et al
as 19-1577
Defendant / Appellee:
DUNCAN MACLAREN and LINDA MCQUIGGAN, Chaplain
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDDY HARDRICK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
