Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Thompkins v. Santistevan, et al
as 24-2054
Petitioner:
TERRICK L. THOMPKINS
Respondent:
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Skaggs v. Santistevan, et al
as 24-2011
Petitioner:
JASON SKAGGS
Respondent:
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Aguilar v. Santistevan, et al
as 23-2163
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY J. AGUILAR
Respondent / Appellee:
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Hester v. Lea County Correctional Facility (GEO Group) Staff et al
as 2:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Wesley Dean Hester
Defendant:
Lea County Correctional Facility (GEO Group) Staff, New Mexico Corrections Department, Wexford Health Services and Staff Thereof and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ybarra v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2023cv00193
Petitioner:
Emilio Ybarra
Respondent:
State of New Mexico, Dwayne Santistevan and Lea County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Granado v. Grey et al
as 1:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Augustin F Granado Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Grey, The D.P.J, N.C.D.A.C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ervin v. Santistevan, et al
as 22-2102
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK ERVIN
Respondent / Appellee:
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Fawley v. Tafoya Lucero, et al
as 22-2091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN W. FAWLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ALISHA TAFOYA LUCERO, DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden, LCCF, HOWARD CLARKE, Director and others
Ortega v. Santistevan, et al
as 22-2029
Petitioner / Appellant:
NIEVES SONNY ORTEGA
Respondent / Appellee:
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
