Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Robey v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 0:2009cv01569
Plaintiff:
Curtis A. Robey
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, North Central Regional Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Mitra v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv01050
Petitioner:
Rajib K. Mitra
Respondent:
Dwight Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Lane v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv00864
Petitioner:
Steven Maurice Lane
Respondent:
Dwight Fondren and Dwight Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Somerset v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv00788
Petitioner:
Andre R. Somerset
Respondent:
Dwight Fondren and Dwight Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv00762
Petitioner:
Phillip G. Scott
Respondent:
Dwight Fondren and Dwight Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barker v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv00577
Petitioner:
Clarence L. Barker
Respondent:
Dwight Fondren and Dwight Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Biggers v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv00561
Petitioner:
Carlton Biggers
Respondent:
Dwight Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campbell v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv00736
Petitioner:
Herbert Campbell
Respondent:
Dwight Fondren and Dwight Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Melendez v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv00462
Petitioner:
Ronald Melendez
Defendant:
Dwight Fondren and Dwight Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv00476
Petitioner:
Jose Ramirez
Respondent:
Dwight Fondren and Dwight Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.