Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Forester-Hoare v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Dr Freeman, Dr Lavoie, Baier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kalafi v. Pollard et al
as 2:2023cv01591
Plaintiff:
G'esa Kalafi and Stanley Felton
Defendant:
Thomas Pollard, Bret Mierzejewski, Jeremy J Wiltzius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Radtke et al
as 2:2023cv01408
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Dylon Radtke, Michelle Haese, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Yang et al
as 2:2023cv00983
Plaintiff:
Littleton Emmett Jackson
Defendant:
David Yang, Montrel Bridges, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmonson v. Kinton et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Jason L Edmonson
Defendant:
Kinton, Rahn, Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Breen-Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael L Evans
Defendant:
Dr Martha Breen-Smith, Hillary Berg, Dr Todd Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery v. Cole et al
as 2:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Glen R Jeffery, Jr
Defendant:
Lt Cole, CO Peterson, CO Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sholar v. Radtke
as 2:2023cv00066
Petitioner:
Lamont Sholar
Respondent:
Dylon Radtke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson, Titus et al v. TextBehind et al
as 3:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson and Ronald Branch
Defendant:
TextBehind, TextBehind CEO & COO, Wendi Monfils and others
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zimmerman v. Carr et al
as 1:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Mitchell G Zimmerman
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr, Dylon Radtke, Cindy O'Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
