Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Miller, et al v. Basic Research, et al
as 15-4113
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PAMELA MILLER, RANDY HOWARD, DONNA PATTERSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BASIC RESEARCH, LLC, DYNAKOR PHARMACAL, LLC, WESTERN HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Objector - Appellant:
JEFFREY LEE WEINSTEIN
Miller, et al v. Basic Research, et al
as 15-4113
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAMELA MILLER, RANDY HOWARD, DONNA PATTERSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BASIC RESEARCH, LLC, DYNAKOR PHARMACAL, LLC, WESTERN HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Appellant:
JEFFREY L. WEINSTEIN
Miller, et al v. Basic Research, et al
as 13-4048
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellee:
PAMELA MILLER, RANDY HOWARD and DONNA PATTERSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
BASIC RESEARCH, LLC, DYNAKOR PHARMACAL, LLC, DENNIS GAY and others
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 50
Basic Research, LLC, et al v. Miller, et al
as 10-603
Petitioner:
BASIC RESEARCH, LLC, DYNAKOR PHARMACAL, LLC, WESTERN HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Respondent:
PAMELA MILLER, RANDY HOWARD and DONNA PATTERSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Game Show Network, LLC v. Basic Research, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv05020
Plaintiff:
Game Show Network, LLC and Game Show Network, LLC
Defendant:
Basic Research, LLC and Dynakor Pharmacal, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type:
Contract
Nicole Forlenza et al v. Dynakor Pharmacal, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv03730
Plaintiff:
Nicole Forlenza, Nicole Forlenza, Nicole Forlenza and others
Defendant:
Dynakor Pharmacal, LLC, Dynakor Pharmacal, LLC, Dynakor Pharmacal, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Tompkins v. Basic Research LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00244
Plaintiff:
Mary Tompkins
Defendant:
Basic Research LLC, Basic Research LLC, Dynakor Pharmacal, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
