Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Butler-Moos v. The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, et al
as 1:2021cv01356
Plaintiff:
Fred Butler-Moos
Defendant:
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America and E&B Natural Resources Management Corporation Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BUTLER-MOOS v. THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021at00879
Plaintiff:
Fred Butler-Moos
Defendant:
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America and E&B NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CORPORATION PLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
E&B Natural Resources Manageme, et al v. Center for Biological Diversit, et al
as 19-17451
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and DOES, 1-50
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES C. ROTH, RICHARD S. BLOOM, SHARYL G. BLOOM and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Proposed Intervenor-Defendant
E&B Natural Resources Management Corporation et al v. County of Alameda et al
as 4:2018cv05857
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Does 1-50 and Alameda County Board of Supervisors
Plaintiff:
James C. Roth, Richard S. Bloom, Sharyl G. Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: South Coast Oil Corporation
as 12-55365
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SOUTH COAST OIL CORPORATION
Appellant:
JOSEPH M. PALLADINO, individually and in his capacity as Trustee for the Alfred Joseph Palladino 1994 Trust and BG OPERATIONS, LLC, a California limited liability company
Appellee:
SOUTH COAST OIL CORPORATION, DANIEL TOE, JAMES J. JOSEPH, Trustee and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-55147
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-55146
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00491
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
