Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Royal Bengal Logistics, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv61179
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Royal Bengal Logistics, Inc., Sanjay Singh, Sheetal Singh and others
Respondent:
TD Bank, N.A.
Garnishee:
E*Trade Securities LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Fox et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv21478
Defendant:
Square Inc., Trading 212 LTD., Citadel Enterprise Americas, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Preenon Huq and Julie Fox
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Clapp et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv21441
Defendant:
Square Inc., Freetrade, Ltd., Trading 212 Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Clapp and Denise Redfield
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015
Dechirico et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv21451
Defendant:
Square Inc., Trading 212 LTD., Citadel Enterprise Americas, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Palmer, Angel Guzman and Dan Dechirico
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Ross et al v. Robinhood Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv21338
Defendant:
ROBINHOOD SECURITIES LLC, Trading 212 LTD., Citadel Enterprise Americas, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Erika Mercado, C. Louis Bunya, Ryan Zachary Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Cheng et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv21318
Defendant:
Square Inc., The Charles Schwab Corporation, Freetrade, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Cheng and Terell Sterling
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
E*Trade Securities LLC v. Nash et al
as 8:2012cv01766
Plaintiff:
E*Trade Securities LLC
Defendant:
Lucille Nash and Gerald Q. Nash
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Bosowski et al v. E*Trade Securities LLC
as 8:2012cv01251
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bosowski , Q. Peter Nash , Debra Nash and others
Defendant:
E*Trade Securities LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
