Cases 1 - 10 of 65
FIGUEROA-GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07450
Plaintiff:
ELMER E FIGUEROA-GARCIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PC) Evans v. Diaz et al
as 2:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
David Evans and David Arkeen Evans
Defendant:
Ernesto Diaz, John Martin, Christian Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Evans v. Diaz et al
as 1:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
David Arkeen Evans
Defendant:
Ernesto Diaz, John Martin, Christian Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Evans v. Martin et al
as 2:2021cv01016
Defendant:
John Bradford, Stanley, E. Figueroa and others
Plaintiff:
David Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Evans v. Martin et al
as 1:2021cv00941
Defendant:
John Bradford, Stanley, E. Figueroa and others
Plaintiff:
David Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIGUEROA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24689
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER E FIGUEROA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Evans v. Martin et al
as 1:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Kohler, John Bradford, J. Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
David Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Evans v. Martin et al
as 2:2021cv00080
Defendant:
Kohler, John Bradford, J. Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
David Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIGUEROA, SR. v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv02430
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANILO E. FIGUEROA, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON v. OFC J. SALERNO et al
as 2:2019cv19926
Defendant:
OFC WONG, RRM F.B.O.P. PATRICK MCFARLAND, LT. EICHENRACH and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B ANDERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
