Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Harris v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Detrick Dewayne Harris
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Davis et al
as 3:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
R. Davis, S. Dunn, C. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Griffin et al
as 3:2013cv00431
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Steven J. Griffin , Michael Rice , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Shaw et al
as 3:2013cv00428
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
F. Shaw , T. Houston , S. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Gibson et al
as 3:2013cv00427
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
M. Gibson , F. Shaw , F. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Graham et al
as 3:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Joyce Graham , E. L. Sparkman, David Petrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Harbin et al
as 3:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
A. Harbin , C. Dykes , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jermaine A. James
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, E. L. Sparkman and D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Raymond Detention Center et al
as 3:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Raymond Sheriff Detention Center, F. Shaw, R. Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Shaw et al
as 4:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
F. Shaw, R. Rice, F. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
