Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Yellen v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Mike Yellen
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Governor Josh Green, Mitch Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dicks et al v. Hawaii Republican Party, et al et al
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Karl Orlando Dicks, James Ryan Malish and Daniel Decker
Defendant:
Hawaii Republican Party, et al, Shirlene Ostrov, Lynne Finnegan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
National Shooting Sports Foundation v. Lopez
as 1:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
National Shooting Sports Foundation
Defendant:
Anne E. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. Connors et al
as 1:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Montell Alexander Bowman
Defendant:
Clare E. Connors and Anne E. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Wolford et al v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jason Wolford, Alison Wolford, Atom Kasprzycki and others
Defendant:
Anne E. Lopez and Maui County
Amicus Curiae:
California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated, Gun Owners of California, Second Amendment Law Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rapozo v. Hawaii, State of
as 1:2023cv00188
Petitioner:
Richard B. Rapozo and Richard Ropozo and Richard Borges Rapozo
Respondent:
Attorney General Hawaii, State of, Warden Shawn Wead and Anne E. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roa et al v. Lopez
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Peter Roa and Dirck Sielken
Defendant:
Anne E. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Pagba et al
as 1:2022cv00520
Defendant:
Rodney Pagba, City and County of Honolulu and Anne E. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pagba v. City and County of Honolulu et al
as 1:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Rodney Pagba
Defendant:
Anne E. Lopez and City and County of Honolulu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
