Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Glass Sr v. Martin
as 3:2007cv00255
Petitioner: James F Glass Sr
Respondent: Walter E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spates v. Martin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00111
Petitioner: Richard W Spates
Respondent: Walter E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GLASS v. MARTIN
as 1:2007cv00638
Petitioner: JAMES F. GLASS, SR,
Respondent: WALTER E. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPATES v. MARTIN
as 1:2007cv00607
Petitioner: RICHARD W. SPATES
Respondent: WALTER E. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Martin
as 3:2007cv00213
Petitioner: Eric T Mitchell
Respondent: Walter E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bateman v. Martin
as 3:2007cv00179
Petitioner: Vernon Bateman
Respondent: Walter E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Martin
as 3:2007cv00114
Petitioner: Marvin Watkins, III
Respondent: Walter E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Breaston v. Martin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00094
Petitioner: Byron K Breaston
Respondent: Walter E Martin and Michael Books
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Cleave v. Martin
as 3:2007cv00078
Petitioner: Gregory L Van Cleave
Respondent: Walter E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Komyatti v. Martin
as 3:2007cv00060
Petitioner: Paul Komyatti
Respondent: Walter E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?