Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ellis v. Alexander et al
as 1:2016cv05155
Plaintiff:
Krystal Ellis
Defendant:
Dana Alexander, Barbara West, Robert Klich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuentes v. Stanton et al
as 1:2015cv10895
Plaintiff:
David Fuentes
Defendant:
P. Stanton, A E Roberts and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv05424
Plaintiff:
Tyrone E. Roberts and Emma Roberts
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and GlaxoSmith Kline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv10441
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Roberts
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Roberts et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv08738
Plaintiff:
Billy E. Roberts, Sr. and Kathryn Roberts Coleman
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Actavis, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Capovilla v. Doyle et al
as 1:2010cv06559
Plaintiff:
Frank Capovilla
Defendant:
William J Doyle, Dallas J Howe, Christopher M Burley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Painter et al v. Doyle et al
as 1:2010cv06389
Plaintiff:
Richard W Painter , Susan C Painter and Herbert Francl
Defendant:
William J Doyle, Dallas J Howe, Christopher M Burley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. City of Chicago, a municipal corporation et al
as 1:2010cv03958
Plaintiff:
Marshaun Jones
Defendant:
City of Chicago, a municipal corporation , Matthew J McCall and John E Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Robert et al
as 1:2009cv02995
Petitioner:
Reginald Pratt
Respondent:
Brad E. Robert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
