Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Iesha Mitchell, et al v. City of Benton Harbor, MI, et al
as 23-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IESHA MITCHELL, Guardian and next friend of A.M., KEA N. BENNETT, Guardian and next friend of A.B. next friend of S.B., et al., CHRISTINE ANDERSON, Guardian and next friend of A.L.next friend of D.L. 1 next friend of D.L. 2 next friend of M.L. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, MARCUS MUHAMMAD, MICHAEL O'MALLEY and others
In the Matter of E.N. Bisso & Son, Inc., and Bisso Offshore, LLC
as 2:2019cv11813
Petitioner:
Bisso Offshore LLC and E.N. Bisso & Son, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. ยง 0181
TMF Trustee Limited, et al v. M/T Megacore Philomena, et al
as 19-55532
Not Yet Classified:
E.N. BISSO & SON, INC., RILEY-SHERMAN SHIPPING AGENCY, INC., MONJASA LTD. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
M/T MEGACORE PHILOMENA, her engines, boilers, tackles, and other appurtenances, etc., in rem and HURRICANE NAVIGATION, INC., a Marshall Islands Corporation, in personam
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TMF TRUSTEE LIMITED
TMF Trustee Limited, et al v. M/T Megacore Philomena, et al
as 19-55535
Not Yet Classified:
E.N. BISSO & SON, INC., RILEY-SHERMAN SHIPPING AGENCY, INC., MONJASA LTD. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HURRICANE NAVIGATION, INC., a Marshall Islands Corporation, in personam and M/T MEGACORE PHILOMENA, her engines, boilers, tackles, and other appurtenances, etc., in rem
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TMF TRUSTEE LIMITED
I.R. v. LAUSD
as 13-56211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
I.R., a minor by her Mother E.N.
Defendant - Appellee:
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Medsker et al v. Feingold et al
as 3:2007mc00011
Plaintiff:
Thomas Medsker, Thomas J. Blum, T. H. Holloway and others
Defendant:
David J. Feingold, Darren Silverman, Kristian Baso and others
Movant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
