Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Federal Trade Commission v. Tempur Sealy International, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02508
Witne:
Gardner White Co. Inc. and E.S. Kluft & Company, Inc.
Interested Party:
Serta Simmons Bedding, LLC
Defendant:
Mattress Firm Group Inc. and Tempur Sealy International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Gower v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust et al
as 3:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
Marva Gower
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
John & Jane Doe #1 et al v. Kipp, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01179
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #4 (a/n/f E.S.), John & Jane Doe #1 (a/n/f J.P.), John & Jane Doe #3 (a/n/f A.G.C.) and others
Defendant:
Legacy Community Health Services, Inc., KIPP Texas, Inc., Kipp, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
ES v. Best Western International Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Choice Hotels International, Inc., Marriott International, Inc., Best Western International Inc and others
Plaintiff:
E.S. and ES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Starks v. Pierson
as 4:2013cv01100
Petitioner:
David Michael Starks
Respondent:
E.S. Pierson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
E.E. Reed Construction, L.P. v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 4:2011cv03618
Plaintiff:
E.E. Reed Construction, L.P.
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sapp v. Kimbley et al
as 4:2009cv03749
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Sapp
Defendant:
Forsit Kimbley, Nancy Mitchell, P.A. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
