Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BORDNER v. AIL HOSPITALITY, LLC
as 1:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BORDNER
Defendant:
AIL HOSPITALITY, LLC doing business as AIL HOSPITALITY GROUP, LUDLOW STREET, LLC doing business as DAYS INN BY WYNDHAM, EASTWOOD DRIVE, INC. doing business as RAMADA BY WYNDHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
EASTWOOD AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC v. HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC.
as 2:2022cv01269
Plaintiff:
EASTWOOD AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
United States of America v. Eastwood
as 3:2014cv02097
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jill A. Eastwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
ANGELES v. WALILEWSKI et al
as 2:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
MANIOCATEX ANGELES
Defendant:
APRIL WALILEWSKI and BRIAN EASTWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quality Builders Warranty Corporation v. Eastwood Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02500
Plaintiff:
Quality Builders Warranty Corporation
Defendant:
Eastwood Construction Co., Inc. and Eastwood Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EASTWOOD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56324
Plaintiff:
BILLY R. EASTWOOD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
EASTWOOD v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31958
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. EASTWOOD
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
EASTWOOD v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31957
Plaintiff:
BILLY R. EASTWOOD
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
