Cases 1 - 9 of 9
REID v. DOE et al
as 3:2023cv03622
Plaintiff:
BERNARD REID
Defendant:
BETA DOE, CHARLIE DOE, DELTA DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckstein v. TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. f/k/a Teva Global Respiratory Research, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03767
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Echo Eckstein
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. f/k/a Teva Global Respiratory Research, LLC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ALZA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ECHO LAKE ENTERPRISES LLC v. WEST
as 1:2021cv10412
Plaintiff:
ECHO LAKE ENTERPRISES LLC
Defendant:
GEOFFREY WEST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ABARCA et al v. KC CONSULTING GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN ABARCA , NIXON ARNOLD , SYUAPA ALVAREZ and others
Defendant:
KC CONSULTING GROUP, INC., ECHO MOLDING, INC., CARTER WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
THE ECHO DESIGN GROUP, INC. v. ARTSANA USA, INC.
as 2:2014cv00416
Plaintiff:
THE ECHO DESIGN GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
ARTSANA USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
THE ECHO DESIGN GROUP, INC. v. MARK AND SPENCER GROUP PLC
as 2:2013cv07063
Plaintiff:
THE ECHO DESIGN GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
MARK AND SPENCER GROUP PLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ECHO FILM S.r.l. v. DIGIWORLD STUDIOS, INC., ET AL.
as 2:2012mc00216
Plaintiff:
ECHO FILM S.r.l.
Defendant:
DIGIWORLD STUDIOS, INC., ET AL.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DIAZ v. VAN GELAS, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv02647
Plaintiff:
JOAN M. DIAZ
Defendant:
VAN GELAS, INC., VAN GELAS BROTHERS, ECHO'S NIGHT CLUB INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
