Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Terry et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03898
Plaintiff:
Eva Terry and Ed Terry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gauthier et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29751
Plaintiff:
Joan Gauthier and Ed Gauthier
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sipes et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv27771
Plaintiff:
Karen Sipes and Ed Schmidt
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prater et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv21234
Plaintiff:
Rosetta Prater and Ed Prater
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20077
Plaintiff:
Robin Young Davis and Vernon Ed Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv10507
Plaintiff:
Janice Ed Woods and Jackie Ray Woods
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eaves et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32805
Plaintiff:
Peggy Eaves and Ed Eaves
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samuel et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv23004
Plaintiff:
Cathleen Samuel and Ed Samuel
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stamer-Simich et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv19832
Plaintiff:
Tracey Stamer-Simich and Ed Simich
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Breeding et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01647
Plaintiff:
Pamela Breeding and Ed Breeding
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
