Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BANKS v. BRATCHER et al
as 5:2008cv00252
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Banks
Defendant:
BRATCHER, WRIGHT, MUCUTCHAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BANKS v. GREER, et al
as 1:2008mc00308
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
MILDRED GREER, CHRISTOPHER CURRY, EDEN WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Banks v. Pearson et al
as 5:2008cv00153
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson, FCC Yazoo City (Low), Eden White and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Banks v. Reese et al
as 5:2008cv00012
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Eden White, Christopher Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Williams et al
as 5:2007cv00226
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
"Unknown" Williams, Constance Reese, Unknown Holston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Banks v. Reese et al
as 5:2007cv00220
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Banks
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Christopher Curry, Eden White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Dalton et al
as 5:2007cv00183
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Banks
Defendant:
Unknown Dalton, George Bush, Constance Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Reese et al
as 5:2007cv00172
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Eden White and FCC Yazoo City (Low)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
