Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brucestan Jordan v. Edmond Cicchi, et al
as 14-3512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCESTAN T. JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMOND CICCHI and BRIAN J. FENYAK
RIVIERE v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX et al
as 3:2014cv04686
Plaintiff:
MANOUCHEKA RIVIERE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yusef Steele v. Warden Cicchi, et al
as 14-3127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YUSEF STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMOND CICCHI, DEPUTY WARDEN F. MASONE, INTERNAL AFFAIRS SGT DEAMICIS and others
D'AMORE v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER et al
as 3:2013cv05661
Plaintiff:
BRUCE MICHEAL D'AMORE, JR.
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER, HOGAN, HEMINGWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brucestan Jordan v. Edmond Cicchi, et al
as 10-2386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCESTAN T. JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMOND CICCHI, MIDDLESEX CTY, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER and others
MOORE v. CICCHI et al
as 3:2009cv03708
Plaintiff:
JON PAUL MOORE
Defendant:
EDMOND CICCHI, JOYCE PORRE, CAPT. JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. CICCHI et al
as 3:2009cv03663
Plaintiff:
JON PAUL MOORE
Defendant:
EDMOND CICCHI, JOYCE PIRRE, CAPTAIN JOHN DOE # 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. CICCHI et al
as 3:2009cv02397
Plaintiff:
JON PAUL MOORE
Defendant:
EDMOND CICCHI, JOYCE PIRRE, STACEY BLEISTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARINO v. CICCHI et al
as 3:2009cv00922
Plaintiff:
PIPPO MARINO
Defendant:
EDMOND CICCHI, SANDRA VARGAS, DR. ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MARINO v. CICCHI et al
as 3:2009cv00772
Plaintiff:
PIPPO MARINO
Defendant:
EDMOND CICCHI and GEORGE HAYMAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
