Cases 21 - 30 of 31
AUSTIN v. REILLY
as 1:2008cv00553
Plaintiff:
ROMES AUSTIN
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BRYANT v. REILLY et al
as 1:2008cv00315
Plaintiff:
RICKY BRYANT
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., CRANSTON MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. REILLY et al
as 1:2008cv00311
Plaintiff:
MELVIN CROSBY BEY
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., DEVON BROWN and JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. REILLY et al
as 1:2007cv01934
Plaintiff:
ERNEST D. SMITH
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, DEBORAH A. SPAGNOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. REILLY et al
as 1:2007cv01689
Plaintiff:
MELVIN THOMAS
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, DEBRA A. SPANGOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VARNER v. REILLY et al
as 1:2007cv01509
Petitioner:
LARRY A. VARNER
Respondent:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR. and TERRENCE D. JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SWINTON v. REILLY et al
as 1:2007cv01120
Plaintiff:
DARU SWINTON
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PUIFORY v. REILLY et al
as 1:2007cv01007
Plaintiff:
REGINALD S. PUIFORY
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, DEBORAH A. SPAGNOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
REID v. US PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv00725
Plaintiff:
JIBREEL REID
Defendant:
US PAROLE COMMISSION, US PAROLE COMMISSION, EDWARD F. REILLY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
