Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gilbert Martinez v. USA, et al
as 20-2103
Defendant / Appellee:
HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND, In their individual and offical capacities, HONORABLE ROSLYNN MAUSKOFF, HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT M. MARTINEZ
Gilbert MartinezIn re: Gilbert Martinez
as 19-3085
Not Yet Classified:
HONORABLE ROSLYNN MAUSKOFF, BERKS COUNTY ASSESSMENT OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Gilbert Martinez v. USA, et al
as 17-2947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT M. MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EDWARD G. SMITH, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, EAGLE DISPOSAL and others
In re: Leisawitz Heller
as 17-2710
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: LEISAWITZ HELLER
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ARTESANIAS HACIENDA REAL SA DE CV
Defendant - Respondent:
NORTH MILL CAPITAL LLC
Nominal Respondent:
EDWARD G. SMITH
Anthony Mina, et al v. Chester County, et al
as 16-3420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY S. MINA, TLC DREAMS FOUNDATION and THE TRUTH TODAY FOR A BETTER TOMORROW POLITICAL COMMITTEE
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY, JOSEPH M. WATERS, CCDRS DIRECTOR, WILLIAM R. WHITEHEAD, CCDRS DEPUTY DIRECTOR and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DELAWARE COUNTY, WEST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP and others
In re: WM. C. Plouffe, Jr.
as 16-2582
Petitioner:
In re: WM. C. PLOUFFE, JR.
Respondent:
F. JAVIER CEVALLOS, PRESIDENT OF KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, AS EMPLOYEE, OFFICER SUPERVISOR, AND/OR POLICYMAKER IN HIS INDIVISUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES
Nominal Respondent:
EDWARD G. SMITH and PETRESE B. TUCKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-4534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
