Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Edward Newsome v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-20436
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Newsome v. Davis
as 4:2018cv01270
Petitioner:
Edward Roy Newsome
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edward Newsome v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-11087
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME, also known as Edward R. Newsome
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Edward Newsome v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20523
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Newsome v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv02524
Petitioner:
Edward Roy Newsome
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edward Newsome v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10685
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME, also known as Edward R. Newsome
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Edward Newsome v. Beach, et al
as 15-10102
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME
Respondent - Appellee:
BEACH, Warden and WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Edward Newsome v. Beach, et al
as 15-10101
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME
Respondent - Appellee:
BEACH, Warden and WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
NEWSOME v. WARDEN BEACH et al
as 2:2015cv00047
Petitioner:
Edward Roy Newsome
Respondent:
WARDEN BEACH, Davis, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Newsome v. Beach
as 2:2015cv00030
Petitioner:
Edward Roy Newsome
Respondent:
Beach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
