Cases 1 - 10 of 12
EMRIT v. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS et al
as 2:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ADAMS & GARTH, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00694
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SANTIAGO v. NORTHWESTERN HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2013cv04070
Plaintiff:
MARISOL SANTIAGO
Defendant:
NORTHWESTERN HUMAN SERVICES, EEOC and PHRC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHIELDS v. EEOC (EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION)
as 2:2013cv03614
Plaintiff:
MARK J. SHIELDS
Defendant:
EEOC (EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOSLEY v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - N.J. et al
as 2:2011cv07890
Plaintiff:
SHANAN R. MOSLEY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - N.J., P.A. DOMESTIC/RELATIONS - PROBATION, SOCIAL SECURITY - PENNSYLVANIA/NJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
