Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Michael Terpin v. AT and T Mobility LLC, et al
as 23-55375
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL TERPIN
Defendant / Appellee:
AT AND T MOBILITY LLC
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10
Amicus Curiae:
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, NATIONAL CONSUMERS LEAGUE and CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION
Kathleen Wilkinson, et al v. Facebook, Inc.
as 22-16889
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FACEBOOK SIMULATED CASINO-STYLE GAMES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHLEEN WILKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NANCY URBANCZYK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LAURA PERKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and others
In re: Kathleen Wilkinson, et al v. Facebook, Inc.
as 22-16888
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FACEBOOK SIMULATED CASINO-STYLE GAMES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KATHLEEN WILKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NANCY URBANCZYK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LAURA PERKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and others
Colin Brickman v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-16785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLIN R. BRICKMAN, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals
Defendant / Appellee:
FACEBOOK, INC. and META PLATFORMS, INC.
Intervenor / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT, ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER and others
Lundy et al v. Facebook Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv06793
Defendant:
Apple Inc, Facebook Inc., Alphabet, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Myriah Watkins, Brendan Lundy, Elizabeth Childers and others
Petitioner:
William Jolly and Electronic Privacy Information Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 17-16783
Amicus Curiae:
SCRAPING HUB, LTD., ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, DUCKDUCKGO, AND INTERNET ARCHIVE, ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HIQ LABS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
LINKEDIN CORPORATION
Winston Smith, et al v. Facebook, Inc., et al
as 17-16206
Defendant / Appellee:
FACEBOOK, INC.
Defendant:
CLEVELAND CLINIC, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER, BJC HEALTHCARE and others
Amicus Curiae:
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE II, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JANE DOE I and WINSTON SMITH
Americans for Prosperity Found v. Xavier Becerra
as 16-55727
Amicus Curiae:
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS, STATE OF MICHIGAN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, in her Official Capacity as Attorney General of California and XAVIER BECERRA, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of California
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION
Chad Eichenberger v. ESPN, Inc.
as 15-35449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD EICHENBERGER
Defendant - Appellee:
ESPN, INC., a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER
In re Google Referrer Header Privacy Litigation
as 5:2010cv04809
Plaintiff:
Paloma Gaos, Gabriel Priyev and Anthony Italiano
Defendant:
Google, LLC
Petitioner:
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Not Classified By Court:
Ms. Kim Morrison, Mr. David Weiner, Theodore H. Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
