Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Canto v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00222
Plaintiff: Salvatore M. Canto
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company, Takeda California, Inc., Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whittemore v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00030
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company, Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and others
Plaintiff: Bert Whittemore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Darling v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00535
Plaintiff: William C. Darling
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
US, et al v. Abbott Laboratories, et al
as 11-1336
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel. David M. Kammerer, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ex rel. David M. Kammerer, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. David M. Kammerer and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID M. KAMMERER
Defendant - Appellee: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ALZA CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Interested Party: PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ORGANIZATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
FECHO et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv10152
Plaintiff: MICHELE FECHO , STEPHEN FECHO , ANDREA ANDREWS and others
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company , Abbott Laboratories, Inc. , Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEELER et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2010cv10666
Plaintiff: MARY KEELER , THOMAS KEELER , ALYSSA ALBERTELLI and others
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MOORE et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2010cv10288
Plaintiff: ROBIN G. MOORE
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FABRIZIO et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2010cv10286
Plaintiff: SUZANNE LYN FABRIZIO and LOUIS FABRIZIO
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Citizens for Consume, et al v. Abbott Laboratories,, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2001cv12257
Plaintiff: Citizens for Consumer Justice , Colorado Progressive Coalition , Congress of California Seniors and others
Defendant: Allergan Worldwide , Astrazeneca US , Bayer, AG and others
Consolidated_plaintiff: Shirley Geller , United Food & Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midest Health Benefits Fund , Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia and others
Consolidated_defendant: Baxter Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. , Fujisawa Pharmaceut, Monsanto CO. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff: Roberta S. Starks , Kimberly K. Hoover , National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund and others
Amicu: Secretary of Health and Human Services
Intervenor: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Intervenor_defendant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY a/k/a BRISTOL-MYERS ONCOLOGY DIVISION/HIV PRODUCTS , GENSIA SICOR, INC., Novartis AG and others
Movant: Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield , Tufts Associated Health Maintenance Organization, Inc., Neighborhood Health Plan, Inc. and others
Adr_provider: Eric Green and Jonathan Marks
Respondent: Luis E. Cobo
Objector: Patricia Weatherly and James W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MACMUNN et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2008cv11207
Plaintiff: JUDITH MACMUNN, JUDITH MACMUNN, JUDITH MACMUNN and others
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?