Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Joslin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
Katherine Elizabeth Macka Joslin
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Loynd v. Woodland Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Loynd
Defendant:
Woodland Enterprises, Inc. and Wesley K. Wood
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Loynd v. Wow 1st, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Loynd
Defendant:
Wow 1st, Inc. and Sean McComas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Crookedarm v. Coby, et al.
as 1:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Ian Jack Crookedarm
Defendant:
Marcus Coby, Elizabeth Hernandez, Maria Coby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roe, et al. v. Critchfield, et al.
as 1:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
RR, a minor, Ryan Roe, Rachel Roe and others
Defendant:
Debbie Critchfield, Idaho State Board of Education, Linda Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crookedarm v. Coby, et al.
as 4:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ian Jack Crookedarm
Defendant:
Marcus Coby, Maria Coby, Crystal Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crooked Arm v. Hernandez, et al.
as 4:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Fan Jack Crooked Arm
Defendant:
Elizabeth Hernandez, Maria Coby and Crystal Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Teton Springs Operations LLC
as 4:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ellis
Defendant:
Teton Springs Operations LLC doing business as Bronze Buffalo Sporting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gerard v. Scott
as 1:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Gerard
Defendant:
Jason D. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sileoni v. Hammon et al
as 1:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Ashley Hammon, Kaylene Hartt, Tanya Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
