Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Elizabeth Carley v. Romeo Aranus, et al
as 23-15271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH CARLEY
Defendant / Appellant:
ROMEO ARANUS
Defendant:
NEVEN, Warden, GENTRY, Warden, DZURENDA, Director and others
Elizabeth Carley v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
as 22-16965
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELIZABETH CARLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, JERRY HOWELL, Warden and CHARLES DANIELS, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections
Respondent:
NDOC/FMWCC and JO GENTRY, Warden
Elizabeth Carley v. Nevens, et al
as 21-15637
Respondent / Appellee:
NEVENS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELIZABETH CARLEY
Carley v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02670
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Carley
Defendant:
Foster, Warden Jo Gentry, Tonya Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carley v. Warden Neven et al
as 2:2017cv02346
Defendant:
Romeo Aranus, BB Clark, Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Carley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizabeth Carley v. Jo Gentry, et al
as 17-15847
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELIZABETH CARLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JO GENTRY, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and NDOC/FMWCC
Carley v. Nevens et al
as 2:2016cv02227
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Nevens
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Carley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carley v. NDOC/FMWCC et al
as 2:2014cv02097
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and NDOC/FMWCC
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Carley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carley v. Fairweather et al
as 2:2013cv01816
Defendant:
Leah Beverly, Kendall Cummings, Michael Fairweather and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Carley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
