Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Michael N. Brown v. Azusa Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv03569
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Brown
Defendant:
Azusa Police Department, Los Angeles County Fire Battalion 16, City of Hope - West Covina Hematology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emanate Health et al v. Optum Health et al
as 2:2023cv09872
Plaintiff:
Emanate Health, Emanate Health IPA, Emanate Health Medical Group and others
Defendant:
Optum Health, Optum Health Plan of California, OptumCare Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mercy General Hospital, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-5013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mercy General Hospital, Regional Medical Center of San Jose, also known as Alexian Brothers of San Jose, Inc., formerly known as Alexian Brothers Hospital, AHMC Anaheim Regional Medical Center, also known as Anaheim Memorial Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
MERCY GENERAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv01397
Plaintiff:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, MILLS-PENINSULA MEDICAL CENTER, MEMORIALCARE ORANGE COAST MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01811
Plaintiff:
EMANATE HEALTH FOOTHILL PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL, EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER doing business as EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL doing business as EMANATE HEALTH QUEEN OF THE VALLEY HOSPITAL formerly known as CITRUS VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER doing business as INTER-COMMUNITY CAMPUS AND QUEEN OF and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
