Cases 61 - 70 of 191
Alex Andaya v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
as 2:2011cv01224
Plaintiff:
Alex Andaya
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation
Hayk Papoyan v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
as 2:2011cv00672
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Hayk Papoyan
Guzman Jr v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jose Guzman Jr
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation , Quality Loan Service Corp and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
De Jose v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2011cv00139
Plaintiff:
Elenita De Jose
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Francis Walter Startup et al v. Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01961
Defendant:
Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation, Jamie Dimon, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Walter Startup and Linda Lee Startup
Diana Maske v. Cal Western Reconveyance Corp et al
as 8:2010cv01943
Defendant:
Cal Western Reconveyance Corp, EMC Mortgage Corporation, Green Point Mortgage Funding Trust 2005-AR 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Maske
Jean C Wilcox et al v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01923
Defendant:
DOES, EMC Mortgage Corporation and J P Morgan Chase Bank N A
Plaintiff:
Sharie Green, Michele Hood, Robert Hood and others
Gregory Winston v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01875
Defendant:
Does, EMC Mortgage Corporation and Ndex West LLC
Plaintiff:
Gregory Winston
Kami O'Brien et al v. Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporatin et al
as 2:2010cv09344
Defendant:
Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporatin, Does, EMC Mortgage Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kami O'Brien and Patrick O'Brien
Kami O Brien et al v. Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv09071
Defendant:
Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation, Cal Western Reconveyance Corporation, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kami O Brien and Patrick O Brien
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
