Cases
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Bright House Networks, LLC.
as 8:2019cv00710
Plaintiff: EMI Mills Music, Inc., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Universal Music Corp. and others
Defendant: Bright House Networks, LLC.
Respondent: Advance Publications, Inc., Sabin, Bermant, and Gould LLP and Jerry Birenz
3Rd Party Defendant: Charter Communications, Inc., Ronald Hughes, Robert Kuszmar and others
Interested Party: MarkMonitor, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Judge S. James Otero and Raymond Zink
Counter Defendant: W Chappell Music Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Warner Records Inc et al v. Charter Communications, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00874
Plaintiff: Stone Diamond Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: EMI Algee Music Corp., Capitol Records, LLC, Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Counter Defendant: Volcano Entertainment III, LLC, Universal Music Publishing AB, EMI Jemaxal Music Inc. and others
Respondent: MarkMonitor, Inc., Jill Lesser, Recording Industry Association of America, The and others
Amicus Curiae: Amici Curiae Copyright Law Professors
Intervenor: Cox Communications, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: BCS Computers LLC
Special Master: Regina M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sony/ATV Publishing, LLC, et al v. Gai Marcos, et al
as 16-6407
Plaintiff - Appellee: SONY/ATV PUBLISHING, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company, SONY/ATV TUNES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, dba Sony/ATV Cross Keys Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Milene Music Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Allegro Music Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Accent Music Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Accorde Music Publishing, dba So, SONY/ATV SONGS LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, dba Sony/ATV Tree Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Acuff Rose Music Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Ballad Music Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Contryside Music Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Bailar Music Publishing, dba Son and others
Defendant - Appellant: GAI MARCOS, Individually and 1729172 ONTARIO, INC., a Canadian corporation, dba Tricerasoft.com, dba Selectkaraoke.com, dba Karaokedownloads.ca
Defendant: JAMES GERALD WOODFORD, et al
EMI Feist Catalog Inc. et al v. Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv02099
Plaintiff: EMI Feist Catalog Inc. , EMI Golden Torch Music Corp. , EMI Grove Park Music, Inc. and others
Defendant: Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation , Soundchoice, Sound Source Studios and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Sony/ATV Music Publishing, LLC et al v. 172902 Ontario, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01929
Defendant: PRIDDIS MUSIC INC., DIGITOP LTD, CARYN MIMOUN and others
Plaintiff: EMI BRILLIG MUSIC INC., EMI HASTINGS CATALOG INC., EMI Robbins Catalog Inc. and others
Counter Plaintiff: 1729172 Ontario, Inc. and Gai Marcos
Interested Party: Ramona DeSalvo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Famous Music, LLC et al v. XM Satellite Radio, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02385
Plaintiff: Famous Music, LLC, Famous Music, LLC, Famous Music, LLC and others
Defendant: XM Satellite Radio, Inc., XM Satellite Radio, Inc., XM Satellite Radio, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
EMI Entertainment World, Inc. et al v. Premium Wireless Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00232
Plaintiff: EMI Entertainment World, Inc., EMI Entertainment World, Inc., EMI Entertainment World, Inc. and others
Defendant: Premium Wireless Services, Inc., Premium Wireless Services, Inc., Premium Wireless Services, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: Premium Wireless Services, Inc., Premium Wireless Services, Inc., Premium Wireless Services, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: EMI Entertainment World, Inc., EMI Entertainment World, Inc. and EMI Entertainment World, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?