Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Vander v. Epana Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04526
Plaintiff:
Karen Vander
Defendant:
Epana Networks, Inc. and TSM Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Elsa Jimenez v. Kang's Distribution, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02107
Plaintiff:
Elsa Jimenez, Elsa Jimenez, Elsa Jimenez and others
Defendant:
Kang's Distribution, Inc. and Epana Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
IDT Telecom, Inc. et al v. CVT Prepaid Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv08006
Plaintiff:
IDT Telecom, Inc. and Union Telecard Alliance, LLC
Defendant:
CVT Prepaid Solutions, Inc., Dollar Phone Services, Inc., Dollar Phone Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
RAMIREZ et al v. EPANA NETWORKS, INC.
as 2:2008cv04040
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO S. RAMIREZ and EDDIE BUKZAM
Defendant:
EPANA NETWORKS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Spira v. CVT Prepaid Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01998
Plaintiff:
Alain Spira
Defendant:
CVT Prepaid Solutions, Inc., Dollar Phone Corp., Dollar Phone Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
IDT Telecom, Inc. et al v. CVT Prepaid Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2007mc00532
Plaintiff:
IDT Telecom, Inc. and Union Telecard Alliance, LLC
Defendant:
CVT Prepaid Solutions, Inc., Dollar Phone Services, Inc., Dollar Phone Enterprise, Inc and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IDT Telecom Inc, et al v. CVT Prepaid Solution, et al
as 07-2544
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IDT TELECOM INC and UNION TELECARD ALLIANCE LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CVT PREPAID SOLUTION, STI PHONE CARD INC, TELCO GROUP INC and others
Defendant:
DOLLAR PHONE SERVICE INC, DOLLAR PHONE ENTERPRISE INC, DOLLAR PHONE CORP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
