Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sanam Conyers Lodging, LLC
as 1:2023mi00110
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
Sanam Conyers Lodging, LLC doing business as Microtel Inn and Suites
Srinivasa YarlagaddaIn re: Srinivasa Yarlagadda
as 23-10509
Petitioner:
In re: SRINIVASA YARLAGADDA
Respondent:
TSYS GLOBAL PAYMENTS and U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Dolgencorp, LLC v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al
as 23-90003
Petitioner:
DOLGENCORP, LLC
Respondent:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and VINCENT JACKSON
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lazer Spot, Inc.
as 1:2022mi00060
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:
Lazer Spot, Inc.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Eberspaecher North America Inc.
as 21-13799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
EBERSPAECHER NORTH AMERICA INC.
Marsha Payton v. DHS Customs and Border Protection, et al
as 21-13158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHA PAYTON
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-12104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lazer Spot, Inc.
as 1:2021mi00033
Defendant:
Lazer Spot, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Marsha Payton v. Equal Employment Opportunity
as 20-12442
Respondent:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Petitioner:
MARSHA PAYTON
Equal Employment Opportunity C v. Austal USA, LLC
as 20-11891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
AUSTAL USA, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
