Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Aiden Stockman et al v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 5:2017cv01799
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Does 1-2, Equality California and others
Defendant:
Elaine C. Duke, Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., James N. Mattis and others
Aiden Stockman et al v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 2:2017cv06516
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Does 1-2, Equality California and others
Defendant:
Elaine C. Duke, Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., James N. Mattis and others
Hispanas Organized for Political Equality-California vs. Hispanas Organized for Political Equality Political Action Committee et al.
as 2:2015cv03992
Defendant:
Does and Hispanas Organized for Political Equality Political Action Committee
Plaintiff:
Hispanas Organized for Political Equality-California
Pickup, et. al. v. Brown, et. al.
as 2:2012cv02497
Plaintiff:
David H. Pickup , Christopher H. Rosick , Joseph Nicolosi and others
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown , Anna M. Caballero , Kim Madsen and others
Intervenor:
Equality California
Movant:
Donald Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2009cv02292
Plaintiff:
Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami and others
Intervenor:
Our Family Coalition, Lavender Seniors of the East Bay, Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Mark B. Horton and others
Respondent:
William T. Criswell
Not Yet Classified:
Proposition 8 Official Proponents, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Californians Against Eliminating Basic Rights
Interested Party:
Media Coalition
Not Classified By Court:
Doug Swardstrom, Honorable Vaughn R. Walker, James L Garlow and others
Amicus Curiae:
City and County of San Francisco, ACLU Foundation of Northern California, Equality California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
