Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Roux v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv01856
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Roux
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Reynolds v. Colvin
as 8:2014cv00065
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and U.S. Attorney Genera Eric H. Holder
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Ryan L. Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Depuy v. Colvin et al
as 8:2014cv00010
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Deborah Gilg and Eric H. Holder
Plaintiff:
Heather Depuy
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sedano v. Colvin
as 4:2013cv03091
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Eric H. Holder , Jr.
Interested Party:
Deborah R. Gilg and Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kay Sedano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Peterson v. Wolvin
as 4:2013cv03080
Defendant:
US Attorney Deborah R. Gilg, US Attorney General Eric H. Holder , Jr. and Carolyn W Wolvin
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Robert C Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Castillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Linda Castillo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Deborah Gilg and Eric H. Holder , Jr.
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Durbin v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv01399
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue , Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Richard G. Callahan
Plaintiff:
John Durbin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Johnson v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv00497
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Larry G. Massanari, Michael O'Leavitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
