Civil Rights Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1107
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Garcia v. City of Carlsbad Board Members et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00668
Plaintiff: Jesus M Garcia
Defendant: City of Carlsbad Board Members et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00267
Plaintiff: David George Clark
Defendant: State of Oklahoma, State County City Officials, et al., Tulsa County Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kemp v. Mauldin Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01080
Plaintiff: Bobby Kemp and Bobby M. Kemp
Defendant: Mauldin Corporation et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Gender)
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff: Michele D Burke
Defendant: City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv00708
Defendant: Jane Doe, The New Mexico Board of Bar Examiners and The National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al.
Plaintiff: Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00709
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02401
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?