Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Gardasil Products Liability Litigation v. n
as 24-1832
Plaintiff:
SHANIE D. ROMAN, Case No. 3:24cv278, MARK THOMAS, on behalf of Z.T., Case No. 3:22cv392, RUBY SILVER, Case No. 3:22cv384 and others
Unknown:
In re: GARDASIL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
MERCK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLC, WATCHUNG PEDIATRICS, a Partnership and others
Gardasil Products Liability Litigation v. n
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY K. HODDICK, Case No. 3:22cv394, TESSA NEEDHAM, 3:24cv291, KAMERON HILTON, Case No. 5:22cv30 and others
Unknown:
In re: GARDASIL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
MERCK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLC, WATCHUNG PEDIATRICS, a Partnership and others
Gardasil Products Liability Litigation v. n
as 24-1831
Plaintiff:
SAHARA WALKER, Case No. 3:22cv388, SCOTT WAGNER, on behalf of S.W., Case No. 3:22-cv-362, CORINN MCELERNEY, Case No. 3:22cv382 and others
Unknown:
In re: GARDASIL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
MERCK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLC, WATCHUNG PEDIATRICS, a Partnership and others
Hartle v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Ethan Hartle
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: Gardasil Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2022md03036
Plaintiff:
Jessica Raymer, Payton Bergin, Kameron Hilton and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp., Watchung Pediatrics and others
Cross Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hartle v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
ETHAN HARTLE
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and Merck Sharp & Dohme, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 pl MDL: Products Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
