Cases 1 - 10 of 28
EVANS v. THROCKMORTON et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOTT EVANS
Defendant:
LARRY MICHAEL THROCKMORTON and H&M LOGGING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HUTTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ALLI LARSEN, DREW LARSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Patricia Evans
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Evans v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Evans
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
HUTTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2022cv00896
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ALLI LARSEN, DREW LARSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Partain et al v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael Sean Partain, Kris Thomas, Darlene Brooks and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Partain et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Michael Sean Partain, Kris Thomas, Darlene Brooks, as Personal Representative of the Estate of James Brooks; Jr. and others
Defendant:
United States of America
HUTTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ALLI LARSEN, DREW LARSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00045
Plaintiff:
Mr. Mitchell Garnet Evans and Mitchell Garnet Evans
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
State of North Carolina v. Evans
as 3:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina
Defendant:
James Anthony Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
