Cases 1 - 6 of 6
CENTRAL WYOMING NEUROSURGERY LLC V. BARTA-ISO AVIATION ET AL.
as 1:2014cv01892
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL WYOMING NEUROSURGERY LLC
Cross Defendant:
EAGLE CREEK AVIATION SERVICES
Defendant:
EAGLE CREEK AVIATION SERVICES, ISO BAR CORPORATION and JETSTREAM ESCROW AND TITLE SERVICES INC
Cross Claimant:
ISO BAR CORPORATION
Unknown:
Eva La
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Davidson et al v. Rockwell International Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00656
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davidson , Jana Davidson and Thomas Farmer
Defendant:
Rockwell International Corporation, Rockwell Automation, Inc., Rockwell Collins, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davidson et al v. Rockwell International Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv03886
Plaintiff:
Keith Davidson , Jana Davidson and Thomas Farmer
Defendant:
Rockwell International Corporation, Rockwell Automation, Inc., Rockwell Collins, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Eagle Creek Aviation Services
Cross_defendant:
Airesearch Manufacturing Company, Alliedsignal Aerospace Services Corporation, Alliedsignal Avionics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Central Wyoming Neurosurgery LLC v. Barta-Iso Aviation et al
as 2:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Central Wyoming Neurosurgery LLC
Defendant:
Barta-Iso Aviation, Eagle Creek Aviation Services and JetStream Escrow and Title Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In The Matter of 200,000 on Deposit in a Bank Account Controlled by Eagle Creek Aviation Services, Inc
as 1:2012mc00175
Plaintiff:
In The Matter of 200,000 on Deposit in a Bank Account Controlled by Eagle Creek Aviation Services, Inc
Hodges v. B & E Houck Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv14289
Plaintiff:
Sue Ann Hodges
Defendant:
B & E Houck Enterprises, Inc., Volo Holdings Ft. Pierce, LLC, Nashville Jet Center, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
