Cases 1 - 10 of 234
Jefferson v. Black
as 1:2024cv00729
Petitioner:
Earl C. Jefferson, II
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beane v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01715
Plaintiff:
Earle K Beane
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Neal v. Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Neal
Respondent:
Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Earl Douglas
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03677
Plaintiff:
Earl Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Schmid et al
as 1:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Earl J Schmid, Faye Wiedrich-Schmid, Marilyn Sue Schmid and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Earl v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03137
Plaintiff:
Darvel Earl
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blankenship v. Peoples Bank
as 1:2023cv00603
Defendant:
Peoples Bank and Limestone Bank
Plaintiff:
Earl Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Lucas
as 2:2023cv02813
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Mr. Joseph Earl Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
