Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Deuna Brown et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv09977
Defendant:
AAI Development Services Inc, AAIPharma Inc, AAIPharma LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Deuna Brown, Jean Cooper, Stephanie Coplen and others
Patricia Easley v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 5:2012cv01946
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet LLC and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Plaintiff:
Patricia Easley
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04177
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Adams v. Easley et al
as 2:2011cv00913
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Adams
Defendant:
Charles L. Easley, Andrew J. Paulson, CGLS Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Adams v. Easley et al
as 2:2011cv00826
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L Adams
Defendant:
Charles L Easley, Andrew J Paulson, CGLS Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Adams v. Easley et al
as 4:2011cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Adams
Defendant:
Charles L. Easley, Andrew J. Paulson, Etal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Antelope Valley Allied Arts Association et al v. Lancaster Redevelopment Agency et al
as 2:2010cv10039
Defendant:
Josie Alcoser, City of Lancaster, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Antelope Valley Allied Arts Association, Evie Cook, Lyndon Easley and others
Easley v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2010cv05635
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Easley
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Sheriff Department, Gerhard Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 4:2010cv05635
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Easley
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Sheriff Department, Gerhard Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 3:2010cv05635
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Easley
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Sheriff Department, Gerhard Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
