Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Virdi et al v. Copley Coffee Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Sukhjinder Virdi and Ravinder Singh
Defendant:
COPLEY COFFEE HOLDINGS, LLC, COPLEY DB 1 LLC, EAST SIDE DD LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Bbosa v. Kamal
as 13-400
Petitioner:
East Side DD LLC, East Side DD II, LLC, East Side DD 101 LLC and others
Respondent:
Hasnae Hamimi, individually and on behalf of all putative class members, Md Alam Hossain, individually and on behalf of all putative class members, Mohib Uddin Kamal, individually and on behalf of all putative class members and others
Tucker v. East Side DD
as 13-96
Petitioner:
East Side DD 101 LLC, East Side DD 104 LLC, East Side DD 105 LLC and others
Respondent:
Melissa Tucker, Individually and on behalf of all other employees similarly situated, Benisha Huger, Mariana Penafiel, individually and on behalf of all other employees similarly situated and others
Bbosa et al v. Kamal et al
as 1:2012cv09310
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bbosa, Hasnae Hamimi, Alam Hossain and others
Defendant:
East Side DD L.L.C. , East Side DD II, L.L.C. , East Side DB II, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Tucker v. East Side DD
as 12-3907
Plaintiff:
Benisha Huger and Mariana Penafiel, individually and on behalf of all other employees similarly situated
Petitioner:
Melissa Tucker, Individually and on behalf of all other employees similarly situated
Respondent:
East Side DD, East Side DD 104 LLC, East Side DD 105 LLC and others
Tucker et al v. East Side DD et al
as 1:2011cv04907
Plaintiff:
Melissa Tucker
Defendant:
East Side DD, East Side DD 101 LLC, East Side DD 104 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv08588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
