Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Easterling v. Reiser
as 3:2020cv00519
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Gene Earl Easterling
Defendant:
Warden S. Reiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Easterling v. Mississippi Correctional Services et al
as 3:2018cv00490
Defendant:
Sheriff Brian Bailey, Rankin County Jail Medical Personel (Medical staff), Barry Vaughn and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Art Tyrone Easterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easterling v. The Pearl Water Association et al
as 3:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
James Fontrel Easterling, Sr.
Defendant:
The Commissioner of the M.D.O.C. (Mississippi), Ronald King, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Ronald King, Wendell Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easterling v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Easterling
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, II, John Doe, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easterling v. McKenzie
as 3:2014cv00797
Plaintiff:
Dana M. Easterling
Defendant:
Kenneth Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Easterling v. Ates et al
as 3:2014cv00526
Plaintiff:
Dana Morrelle Easterling
Defendant:
Landon Ates, Mike Williams and City of Magee, MS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Easterling et al
as 2:2011cv00159
Petitioner:
Andre Davis
Respondent:
Joe Easterling and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Easterling v. Flowood Police Department
as 3:2008cv00523
Plaintiff:
Art T. Easterling
Defendant:
Flowood Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Easterling v. McCullum et al
as 2:2007cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jaime Easterling
Defendant:
Henry A. McCullum and Tanya Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
