Cases 31 - 40 of 140
Sumner v. Easterling
as 2:2012cv02179
Petitioner:
Lamario Sumner
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Buckhanon v. Easterling
as 1:2012cv01038
Petitioner:
Odie Buckhanon
Respondent:
Joseph Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Panzica v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv01026
Plaintiff:
Anthony Panzica
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Hardeman County Correctional Facilities Corporation , Hardeman County Correctional Facility ("HCCF") and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Easterling
as 1:2012cv01006
Petitioner:
Jamie Bailey
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Easterling
as 2:2011cv03119
Petitioner:
Issac Scott
Respondent:
Joseph Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifton v. Bredesen et al
as 1:2011cv01375
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Clifton
Defendant:
Gayle Ray , Chief Executive Officer and President , Joe Easterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grammer v. Easterling
as 1:2011cv00353
Petitioner:
Scott W Grammer
Respondent:
Joseph Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Panzica v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2011cv01101
Plaintiff:
Anthony Panzica
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Hardeman County Correctional Facilities Corporation, Hardeman County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huckabay v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Huckabay
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Reuben Hodge, Corrections Corporations of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Easterling
as 1:2011cv01330
Petitioner:
Terry Wayne Holland
Respondent:
Joseph Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
