Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant:
VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor:
TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Branch, County of et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Branch, County of, Calhoun, County of, Eaton, County of and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Branch, County of et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01045
Plaintiff:
Branch County, Michigan, Calhoun County, Michigan, County of Eaton, Michigan and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Eaton, County of v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00823
Defendant:
SpecGx, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eaton, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Thatcher #384349 et al v. Eaton, County of et al
as 2:2009cv00272
Plaintiff:
Gary Alva Thatcher #384349, Mark Curtin #263758, Curtis Smith #292372 and others
Defendant:
Eaton, County of, Macomb, County of, Kent, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Brooks Bey v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2008cv14114
Plaintiff:
Otis James Brooks Bey
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Dearborn Heights, City of, 20th District Court and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Brooks Bey v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2008cv14112
Plaintiff:
Otis James Brooks Bey
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Dearborn Heights, City of, 20th District Court and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
