Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Schlesinger et al v. Eaton Corporation
as 2:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Bob Schlesinger, Andrew Smith, Jason Thomas and others
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
MCALISTER DESIGN INCORPORATED v. EATON CORPORATION
as 3:2020cv00017
Plaintiff:
MCALISTER DESIGN INCORPORATED
Defendant:
EATON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lancaster v. Eam et al
as 1:2019cv01210
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association, John Doe, XYZ Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Landis+Gyr Technology, Inc. et al v. Eaton Corporation
as 1:2018cv00523
Plaintiff:
Landis+Gyr Technology, Inc. and Landis+Gyr Canada, Inc.
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ashley v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ashley
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Bayer Cropscience, Inc., CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Insurance Company v. Eaton Corporation
as 1:2015cv03544
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myers et al v. Genuine Parts Company et al
as 1:2014cv00368
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA, 3M Company, Dexter Hysol Aerospace, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Myers and Sherry Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
